Did Paul change the Sabbath in I Corinthians 16:1-2?

Did Paul change the Sabbath in I Corinthians 16:1-2?

“Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given order to the churches of Galatia, even so do ye. Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come.” (I Corinthians 16:1-2, KJV emphasis mine throughout)

Some have used these verses from Paul to say that he was moving the Sabbath to the first day of the week, which we call Sunday today. In verse 1, Paul begins by stating his instruction is an order. In other words, it is a specific instruction for a specific situation. It is not a commandment from God, nor does he present it in that manner. An offering was necessary, and he was asking these churches to participate.

We need to break down some of the language used here. The phrase “Lay by him” is tithēmi. It means to “lay in store”.  The phrase “in store” is thēsaurizō and it means 1) to gather and lay up, to heap up, store up 1a) to accumulate riches 1b) to keep in store, store up, reserve. It refers to accumulated goods in a storehouse.

First of all, they did not always have an income like we have today in the ancient world. Some people grew crops, others raised animals. They did not have incomes like we do. The reason he says to come on the first day of the week is because some people would have had crops, foodstuffs, and other items they had to gather up before they could give them. This would have required work and significant common time, which would have broken the Sabbath!  So, Paul tells them to bring them on the first day of the week, which is the first common day after the Sabbath. He wants no contributions when he comes. He will come to preach on the Sabbath – he doesn’t want them working on the Sabbath!

What did Paul really practice and teach when he was in Galatia and Corinth? Galatia was a region in Turkey. One of the cities in this area was Pisidian Antioch. Let’s

Acts 13:14-15, 42-44, 48

14 From Perga they went on to Pisidian Antioch. On the Sabbath they entered the synagogue and sat down. 15 After the reading from the Law and the Prophets, the leaders of the synagogue sent word to them, saying, “Brothers, if you have a word of exhortation for the people, please speak.” …42 As Paul and Barnabas were leaving the synagogue, the people invited them to speak further about these things on the next Sabbath. 43 When the congregation was dismissed, many of the Jews and devout converts to Judaism followed Paul and Barnabas, who talked with them and urged them to continue in the grace of God. 44 On the next Sabbath almost the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord. 48 When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” (emphasis mine throughout)

We can see that while they were in the region of Galatia, they kept the Sabbath even with Gentiles. The whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord. This was a great opportunity to tell them the Sabbath had been changed. Instead, they continued to observe it. What about the city of Corinth? Did Paul keep the Sabbath in that city?

I Corinthians 18:1-4

18 After this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. 2 There he met a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla, because Claudius had ordered all Jews to leave Rome. Paul went to see them, 3 and because he was a tentmaker as they were, he stayed and worked with them. 4 Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks.

We can see by Paul’s example that he kept the Sabbath with Jews and non-Jews in both Galatia and the city of Corinth. Paul’s directive in I Corinthians 16 was to take up a one-time offering for those in need. It required work, which is why he asked them to do it on the first day of the week.

This just shows us that context is key to understanding verses!

 

Kelly McDonald, JR.

BSA President

 

Note: A Strong’s Concordance and Thayer’s Concordance were used to explain the Greek language used here.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s